Frontczak et al v. City of Detroit et al, No. 3:2018cv13781 - Document 53 (E.D. Mich. 2020)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 47 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff Michael Valentino. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) Modified on 1/24/2020 (LWag).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Frontczak et al v. City of Detroit et al Doc. 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NICK FRONTCZAK and MICHAEL VALENTINO, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 18-13781 CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF MICHAEL VALENTINO On December 6, 2019, Defendants City of Detroit, Kenneth Ballinski, Stephen Geelhood, Matthew Bray, Reginald Beasley, Larry Barnett, Amy Matelic, Marlon Wilson, and Gregory Tourville filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Michael Valentino from this action as a sanction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 for twice failing to appear for his scheduled deposition, the second time in violation of this court’s November 26, 2019 order. (ECF No. 46.) On December 7, 2019, Valentino’s attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, claiming that there had been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. The court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and, in the same order, extended the deadline for Valentino to respond to the motion to dismiss to afford him the opportunity to either obtain new counsel or file a pro se response. In that order, the court cautioned Valentino that “[t]he failure to Plaintiff Valentino to file a response to the motion will result in his dismissal from the case for failure to prosecute and for the reasons described in the motion to dismiss.” (ECF No. 49, PageID.746.) Valentino's Dockets.Justia.com response to the motion to dismiss was due January 17, 2020. As of the date of this order, Valentino has not filed a response to the motion or attempted to prosecute this case in any way. For the reasons stated in the court’s December 11, 2019 order and in Defendants’ motion, the court will grant Defendants’ motion and dismiss Valentino from this case with prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Michael Valentino is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the case. s/ Robert H. Cleland / ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: January 24, 2020 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, January 24, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/ Lisa Wagner / Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (810) 292-6522 S:\Cleland\Cleland\HEK\Civil\18-13781.FRONTCZAK.grant.mtd.HEK.docx 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
