Whitledge v. City of Dearborn et al, No. 3:2018cv11444 - Document 37 (E.D. Mich. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 26 Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Whitledge v. City of Dearborn et al Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SANDRA WHITLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-11444 CITY OF DEARBORN, JUSTIN SMITH, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES Defendant City of Dearborn filed a motion to compel Plaintiff’s answers to its interrogatories on December 21, 2018. On December 31, 2018, Plaintiff filed a response to the motion which included as an attachment Plaintiff’s answers to the interrogatories. Defendant did not file a reply to its motion or attempt to challenge Plaintiff’s answers in any way. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories (ECF No. 26) is DENIED AS MOOT. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 4, 2019 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, June 4, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (810) 292-6522 S:\Cleland\Cleland\HEK\Civil\18-11444.WHITELEDGE.terminate.motion.to.compel.HEK.docx Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
