United States of America v. Currency $59,980.00, No. 2:2023cv13217 - Document 14 (E.D. Mich. 2024)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Denying Claimant Quality Collision Parts Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice 8 . Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)

Download PDF
United States of America v. Currency $59,980.00 Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 23-13217 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson v. $59,980.00 U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant in rem. OPINION AND ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT QUALITY COLLISION PARTS INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE [8] In July 2022, Homeland Security Agents executed a search warrant at Quality Collision Auto Parts in Warren, Michigan. (ECF No. 1, PageID.2.) The government had been investigating Quality Collision for three years for the suspected importation of counterfeit auto parts bearing the Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors trademarks. (Id. at PageID.4.) When agents searched the auto parts store, they found and seized over two million dollars’ worth of alleged counterfeit parts and a plastic bank deposit bag with $59,980 in cash—the defendant in rem. (Id. at PageID.5.) In December 2023, the government filed this civil forfeiture action, seeking to forfeit the $59,980 under 18 U.S.C. § 2323 because the government alleged it was “involved in” the intentional trafficking of counterfeit goods, “a knowing violation . . . of 18 U.S.C. § 2320.” (Id.) Quality Collision contests the forfeiture. It says the cash was proceeds of lawful business operations and is not traceable to proceeds of illegal activity. (ECF No. 6, PageID.24.) And it contends that the Dockets.Justia.com government’s complaint fails to meet the pleading requirements under supplemental rule G. (ECF No. 8, PageID.36.) So it filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) The Court held a hearing on this motion on October 21, 2024. For the reasons stated more fully on the record during the hearing, the Court grants the government leave to amend the complaint and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling Quality Collision’s motion to dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the government shall defer the refiling of the amended complaint for 60 days from the entry of this order while the parties explore possible avenues of resolution. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2024 s/Laurie J. Michelson LAURIE J. MICHELSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.