Walker v. Greiner et al, No. 2:2021cv12536 - Document 4 (E.D. Mich. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Denying The Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs 2 and Dismissing Without Prejudice The Civil Rights Complaint 1 . The Court makes no determination as to the merits of the complaint. Lastly, the Court concludes that an appeal from this decision cannot be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (McColley, N)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Walker v. Greiner et al Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARCUS WALKER, #374618, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:21-CV-12536 v. HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW DR. MARY GREINER, et al., Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS AND DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT Michigan prisoner Marcus Walker (“Plaintiff”) has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 concerning his medical care in prison, as well as an application to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs. Although Plaintiff allegedly lacks the funds to pay the filing fees for this civil action, his prison account statement indicates that he has current spendable account balance of $1,148.89 as of October 18, 2021. Moreover, the Court notes that the government currently provides Plaintiff with food, clothing, and shelter such that requiring prepayment of the filing fees for this action will not force him to go without necessary incidentals. See Lyon v Krol, 127 F.3d 763, 765 (8th Cir. 1997). The Dockets.Justia.com Court thus concludes from the financial data that Plaintiff fails to establish indigence and that he can pay the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee for this civil action. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE his civil rights complaint. The Court is required to dismiss the case because the allegation of poverty is untrue. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A). Plaintiff may submit a civil rights complaint with payment of the filing fee and administrative fee in a new case. This case is closed and will not be reopened. The Court makes no determination as to the merits of the complaint. Lastly, the Court concludes that an appeal from this decision cannot be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Arthur J. Tarnow ARTHUR J. TARNOW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 4, 2021
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
