Hoerle v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2021cv11605 - Document 21 (E.D. Mich. 2022)

Court Description: AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING COSTS, EXPENSES, AND ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL JUSTICE ACT AND GRANTING 20 . Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)

Download PDF
Hoerle v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 21 Case 2:21-cv-11605-LVP-PTM ECF No. 21, PageID.1014 Filed 10/24/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KEVIN LEE HOERLE, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-11605 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _______________________________/ AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING COSTS, EXPENSES, AND ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT The agreed motion to amend the September 30 order awarding fees and expenses to separately specify the amount payable as costs is GRANTED. This order replaces the order issued on September 30, 2022. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit on July 11, 2011, seeking judicial review of Defendant’s determination that he is not entitled to social security disability benefits. On July 5, 2022, this Court entered a Judgment remanding the matter to the Commissioner. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff’s counsel represents in the motion that concurrence was sought from Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-11605-LVP-PTM ECF No. 21, PageID.1015 Filed 10/24/22 Page 2 of 2 Defendant and counsel for Defendant indicated that Plaintiff may file the motion as unopposed. (ECF No. 18-10.) In the motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to award Plaintiff’s counsel $402 in costs and $6,749.52 in fees and expenses under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Plaintiff indicates that any payment may be subject to offset by any pre-existing debt Plaintiff may owe to the government. As there is no opposition to Plaintiff’s request for costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees, and because the Court finds that an award is proper under the EAJA, it is granting Plaintiff’s joint request. Any award must be offset by any debt Plaintiff owes to the government. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Therefore, Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded costs in the amount of $402, as well as fees and expenses in the amount of $6,749.52, absent any debt owed by Plaintiff to the government. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 24, 2022

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.