Aldolemy v. FBI Detroit Field Office et al, No. 2:2021cv10809 - Document 39 (E.D. Mich. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT FBI DETROIT FIELD OFFICE'S 33 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Aldolemy v. FBI Detroit Field Office et al Doc. 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MOE M. AL-DOLEMY, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 21-10809 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. SAMER KATO, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, and FBI DETROIT FIELD OFFICE, Defendants. __________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT FBI DETROIT FIELD OFFICE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit against Defendants on April 6, 2021. The Court summarily dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Samer Kato and John Does 1 and 2 on January 12, 2022. (ECF No. 27.) Defendant FBI Detroit Field Office (“FBI”) filed a motion for summary judgment on May 27, 2022. (ECF No. 33.) The matter has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey for all pretrial proceedings, including a hearing and determination of all nondispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (ECF No. 6.) Dockets.Justia.com On September 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Grey issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court grant the FBI’s summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 38.) At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Grey advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. (Id. at Pg ID 274.) Magistrate Judge Grey further specifically advises the parties that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal.” (Id.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R. The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Grey. The Court therefore adopts the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: December 2, 2022 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, December 2, 2022, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail. s/Aaron Flanigan Case Manager 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
