MJC Ventures LLC et al v. Detroit Trading Company et al, No. 2:2019cv13707 - Document 37 (E.D. Mich. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Denying 17 Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand, Granting 18 Defendants' Motion to Strike and Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, Denying as Moot 21 Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Dispositive Motion Practice, and Denying 34 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com MJC VENTURES LLC ET AL. DETROIT TRADING COMPANY ET AL. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND (ECF NO. 17), GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 18), DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY DISPOSITIVE MOTION PRACTICE (ECF NO. 21), AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 34) MJC Ventures LLC et al v. Detroit Trading Company et al Doc. 37 DENY GRANT DISMISS DENY I. BACKGROUND II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Roth v. Viviano Id then III. ANALYSIS a. MOTION TO REMAND Gamel v. City of Cincinnati Harper v. AutoAlliance Int’l, Inc. Stevens v. Saint Elizabeth Med. Ctr., Inc. Landefeld v. Marion Gen. Hosp. Aschinger v. Columbus Showcase Co. Carnegie–Mellon Univ. v. Cohill Harper See also City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons Chelten v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Musson Theatrical, Inc. v. Fed. Exp. Corp. See also Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply and See even if could See Carnegie-Mellon Univ. at every stage of the litigation Ziegler v. IBP Hog Market, Inc. See Cicchini v. Blackwell Ziegler Moon, Blakely v. United States See Taylor v. First of Am. Bank-Wayne See e.g. See Harper, Stevens See Carnegie-Mellon Univ. Stroud v. Bank of Am., N.A. Harper Carnegie–Mellon Univ. See Taylor not again b. Motion for Leave to Amend Ziegler, Cicchini Ziegler League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Bredesen Kottmyer v. Maas Albrecht v. Treon Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly Jones v. City of Cincinnati Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n Amini v. Oberlin Coll. continued See See See Ziegler See Riverview Health Inst. LLC v. Med. Mut. of Ohio Smith v. Smith Franks v. Franks See See Wolding v. Clark not Blankenship v. Superior Controls, Inc. See Blankenship Wolding Matter of Est. of Butterfield See Bell Atlantic Corp. Passa v. City of Columbus Amini Id See Sam Han v. Univ. of Dayton Sam Han Twombly MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS League of United Latin Am. Citizens Kottmyer Albrecht Atl. Corp. Bell See Cicchini i. Shareholder Oppression3 Blankenship, Estes v. Idea Eng’r & Fabrications, Inc. See See Smith v. Smith Id See Franks Smith legal factual See Ashcroft v. Iqbal Bromley v. Bromley after Bromley Id Bromley Id Bromley Bromley Id Bromley Id Wolding See Wolding as a shareholder as a shareholder Franks Wolding Hofmesiter Family Tr. v. FGH Indus., LLC ii. Breach of Fiduciary Duty Prod. Finishing Corp. v. Shields See See also Petroleum Enhancer, LLC v. Woodward Wallad v. Access BIDCO, Inc. Prentis Family Found. v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Inst. Pittiglio v. Michigan Nat’l Corp. Plaza Secs. Co. v. Fruehauf Corp. See See In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. Twombly Iqbal Bromley v. Bromley Bromley Id Vesser v. Robinson Hotel Co. iii. Unjust Enrichment Karaus v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Kammer Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. v. East China Twp. Schools Cf. Global Technology, Inc. v. Yubei (Xinxiang) Power Steering Sys. Co. Ltd. Gold v. Cadence Innovation, LLC Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. See no return iv. Breach of Contract Grifo & Co., PLLC v. Cloud X Partners Holdings, LLC Miller-Davis Co. v. Ahrens Constr., Inc. Borlack v Mackler Bros., Inc. CONCLUSION ORDERS DENIED DENIED DENIED AS MOOT GRANTED DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE SO ORDERED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.