Cole v. Buckner, No. 2:2019cv13299 - Document 25 (E.D. Mich. 2021)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's January 11, 2021 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STEVEN J. COLE, II, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 19-13299 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. SCOTT BUCKNER, Defendant. __________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JANUARY 11, 2021 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b) Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit against Defendant on November 8, 2019. The matter has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. for all pretrial proceedings, including a hearing and determination of all non-dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On January 11, 20121, Magistrate Judge Ivy issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) due to Plaintiff’s failure to keep his address updated. (ECF No. 23.) At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Ivy advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. (Id. at Pg ID 81.) He further specifically advises the parties that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal.” (Id.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R. The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Ivy. A court cannot litigate a plaintiff’s complaint where mail to the plaintiff is repeatedly returned as undeliverable and the court has no means to contact the party. The Court therefore adopts the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 30, 2021 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, April 30, 2021, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail. s/Aaron Flanigan Case Manager 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.