Percy et al v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON et al, No. 2:2019cv11727 - Document 119 (E.D. Mich. 2022)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 115 FIRST MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF BENCH TRIAL, ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/17/2022 01:00 PM before District Judge Linda V. Parker, Bench Trial set for 12/5/2022 09:00 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)

Download PDF
Percy et al v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON et al Doc. 119 Case 2:19-cv-11727-LVP-DRG ECF No. 119, PageID.4646 Filed 09/22/22 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GARY PERCY, MATTHEW PERCY, A.D. HOLDING CORPORATION, A.D. TRANSPORT EXPRESS, INC., A.D. TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT, INC. ADLP GAS, INC., A.D. REAL ESTATE HOLDING CORPORATION, 5601, INC., and 44650, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, PATRICK WILLIAMS, TIM FAAS, JEFFREY GOULET, LEIGH THURSTON, ROBERT CREAMER, MARK HOOK, and NICOLE HAMILTON, Civil Case No. 19-11727 Honorable Linda V. Parker Defendants. and CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, Counter-Plaintiff, v. 5601, INC., Counter-Defendant ____________________________________/ Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-11727-LVP-DRG ECF No. 119, PageID.4647 Filed 09/22/22 Page 2 of 3 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ FIRST MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF BENCH TRIAL This action is ready for trial. Pursuant to the current scheduling order, the final pretrial conference is scheduled for September 27, and a bench trial is scheduled to begin on October 11. On September 14, Defendants filed a motion to adjourn these dates for several reasons including the caseload and personal responsibilities of defense counsel, personal obligations of Defendant Patrick Williams, and the difficulty in locating some of the defendants, who are now retired Canton Township officials. Plaintiffs oppose the motion on several grounds. First, Plaintiffs point out that Canton failed to seek concurrence before filing the motion in violation of Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(a). Plaintiffs next maintain that they will suffer “sever[] prejudice[]” by further delay as Canton Township seeks daily penalties of $500 per building in its counterclaims. Plaintiffs also argue that further “delay will make this case harder to adjudicate . . . as memories fade, people move, and people get older.” Plaintiffs also question whether the motion is filed in good faith. Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Defendants show good cause for an extension of the FPT 2 Case 2:19-cv-11727-LVP-DRG ECF No. 119, PageID.4648 Filed 09/22/22 Page 3 of 3 conference and trial dates, and the two-month delay sought will not prejudice Plaintiffs. While the Court does not excuse Defendants’ failure to strictly adhere to the concurrence requirements in Local Rule 7.1(a)—and advises Defendants that future motions filed in violation of the rule will be stricken—defense counsel has represented that the issue of extending the dates was raised during a telephone conference with Magistrate Judge David Grand at which time Plaintiffs’ counsel clearly communicated that Plaintiffs would not agree to any adjournments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to adjourn (ECF No. 115) is GRANTED. The final pretrial conference will be held at 1:00 p.m. on November 17, 2022, and the trial date is adjourned to December 5, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 22, 2022 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.