Raleigh v. Service Employees International Union, No. 2:2018cv11591 - Document 54 (E.D. Mich. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 , 41 Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com MARK E. RALEIGH, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, Raleigh v. Service Employees International Union Doc. 54 GRANTED IN PART I. DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND see also II. STANDARD OF REVIEW Villegas v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Redding v. St. Eward Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Matsushita Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co. In re Morris See Anderson III. ANALYSIS A. FMLA violation i. Factual background Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. ; see also o o o o o See o o o see also o o o See see also see also see also ii. Interference theory Killian v. Yorozu Auto. Tenn., Inc. Walton v. Ford Motor Co. Callison v. City of Philadelphia see also Reilly v. Revlon, Inc. Kesler v. Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC Tilley v. Kalamazoo Cty. Rd. Comm'n iii. Retaliation theory Killian Arban v. West Publ'g Corp. McDonnell-Douglas Edgar v. JAC Prod., Inc. Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Serv. Co. McDonnell-Douglas Skrjanc See, e.g., Arban real Id. at least played a role Skrjanc iv. Conclusion B. Tort claims i. Defamation Sarkar v. Doe Smith v. Anonymous Joint Enter. ee also See Sias v. Gen. Motors Corp. Glazer v. Lamkin Swenson-Davis v. Martel Any ii. Defamation by implication Panian v. Lambrecht Assocs. Locricchio v. Evening News Ass’n See Trent v. Town of Brookhaven Dailey v. Accubuilt, Inc. Am. Transmission, Inc. v. Channel 7 of Detroit, Inc. iii. Group libel iv. False light invasion of privacy Puetz v. Spectrum Health Hosps. Duran v. Detroit News, Inc. v. Public disclosure of private facts Doe v. Henry Ford Health Sys. Doe v. Mills Doe v. Peterson Duran See CONCLUSION GRANTED IN PART DENIED IN PART. DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE DENIED SO ORDERED
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
