Doe v. Snyder et al, No. 2:2017cv13885 - Document 15 (E.D. Mich. 2018)

Court Description: STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, No. 2:17-cv-13885 v RICHARD SNYDER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, KRISTIE ETUE, DIRECTOR OF THE MICHIGAN STATE POLICE, HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH MAG. JUDGE DAVID GRAND Defendants. John Doe In Pro Per 502 Ballard Street, Apt. #1 Ypsilanti, MI 48197 (313) 463-1267 Adam P. Sadowski (P73864) Attorney for Defendants Michigan Department of Attorney General Civil Litigation, Employment & Elections Division P. O. Box 30736 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 373-6434 sadowskia@michigan.gov / STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT Whereas Plaintiff and Defendants wish to resolve this case in light of the changing legal landscape in both the state and federal courts, including the recent Sixth Circuit decision in Does #1-5 v. Snyder, 834 F.3d 696 (6th Cir. 2016); and Whereas the parties wish to avoid further litigation or expense, and therefore consent to entry of this order; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AND THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THAT: 1. The Defendants, as well as their officers, agents, servants, and employees, shall not enforce the 2006 and 2011 SORA amendments against Plaintiff. 2. Plaintiff will be subject to the following registration and verification requirements, as long as this order remains in effect: a. He will remain listed on the public registry. b. The only requirements or restrictions of SORA that apply to him are: i. To verify quarterly. At quarterly verification they shall report (i) current residential address information and any name change (as set out in M.C.L. §§ 28.727(1)(a) and (d)); and (ii) enrollment at an institution of higher learning or campus information change (as set out in M.C.L. § 28.724a(1)-(2)). Per agreement of the parties, 2 quarterly reporting periods shall be based on the birthmonth schedule set out in M.C.L. § 28.725a (3)(b). ii. To provide fingerprints if not already on file with the Michigan State Police (as set out in M.C.L. § 28.727(1)(q)). iii. To pay the annual fees (as set out in M.C.L. §§ 28.725a(6)(b)-(c) and 28.725b(3)). iv. To maintain a valid driver’s license or state-issued identification card. c. The Defendants will make a notation in their computer system (to which the notation will not be viewable by the public) for Plaintiff to alert viewers to contact the Michigan State Police before taking any action against Plaintiff on SORA-related offenses. d. Plaintiff’s registration period will remain for life, however, he will not be listed in a “tier”. 3. This judgment does not bar application of SORA to Plaintiff in the event that he is convicted of an offense that occurred after July 1, 2011, that requires registration under SORA. 4. If the Michigan Legislature amends or replaces SORA to implement the Sixth Circuit’s holding in Does #1-5 v. Snyder, this order shall terminate on the effective date of any such amendments or new statute. 5. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this order. 3 6. Subject to the terms set forth herein and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/George Caram Steeh Hon. George Caram Steeh U.S. District Judge Dated: April 9, 2018 Approved by: s/Michael Garrison (w/consent) Michael Garrison 502 Ballard Street, Apt. #1 Ypsilanti, MI 48197 s/Adam P. Sadowski Adam P. Sadowski (P73864) Assistant Attorneys General Attorney for Defendants Richard Snyder and Kriste Etue P. O. Box 30736 Lansing, MI 48909 517 373 3203 SadowskiA@michigan.gov 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.