Taylor v. The University of Michigan, No. 2:2017cv11473 - Document 44 (E.D. Mich. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Accepts and Adopts 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and Denying 30 MOTION to Dismiss - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Taylor v. The University of Michigan Doc. 44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT TAYLOR, v. Case No. 2:17-CV-11473 Plaintiff, Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant. / ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S DECEMBER 03, 2018 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ 39 ] Pending before the Court is the magistrate judge’s December 3, 2018 report and recommendation (ECF No. 39). The magistrate judge recommends that the Court deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30). The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citation omitted). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: April 18, 2019 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on April 18, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Bartlett Case Manager
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
