Morrell v. Burt, No. 2:2017cv10961 - Document 47 (E.D. Mich. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Granting re 44 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs on Appeal. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)

Download PDF
Morrell v. Burt Doc. 47 Case 2:17-cv-10961-GCS-DRG ECF No. 47 filed 05/04/20 PageID.1815 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RONALD MORRELL, Petitioner, v. Civil No. 2:17-CV-10961 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEWAYNE BURTON, Respondent. ______________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND COSTS ON APPEAL On January 6, 2020, this Court issued an opinion and order granting petitioner a writ of habeas corpus on his claim that the judge had violated his Sixth Amendment rights by using factors that had not been submitted to the jury to score his sentencing guidelines. This Court denied petitioner habeas relief on his remaining claims and denied him a certificate of appealability. See Morrell v. Burton, No. 2:17-CV-10961, 2020 WL 59700 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 6, 2020). Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal with the Sixth Circuit regarding the claims that had been denied. Pending before the Court is petitioner’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs on appeal. -1- Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:17-cv-10961-GCS-DRG ECF No. 47 filed 05/04/20 PageID.1816 Page 2 of 3 Although the Court has denied a certificate of appealability to petitioner, the standard for granting an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is a lower standard than the standard for certificates of appealability. See Foster v. Ludwick, 208 F. Supp. 2d 750, 764 (E.D. Mich. 2002). Whereas a certificate of appealability may only be granted if petitioner makes a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a court may grant IFP status if it finds that an appeal is being taken in good faith. Id. at 764-65; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R.App.24 (a). “Good faith” requires a showing that the issues raised are not frivolous; it does not require a showing of probable success on the merits. Foster, 208 F. Supp. 2d at 765. Although jurists of reason would not debate the Court’s resolution of petitioner’s claims, the issues are not frivolous; therefore, an appeal could be taken in good faith and petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Id. Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs in Appeal” (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. Dated: May 4, 2020 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2- Case 2:17-cv-10961-GCS-DRG ECF No. 47 filed 05/04/20 PageID.1817 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on May 4, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on Ronald Morrell #955782, Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, 1728 Bluewater Highway, Ionia, MI 48846. s/Brianna Sauve Deputy Clerk -3- Page 3 of 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.