William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak v. Price, No. 2:2016cv13528 - Document 37 (E.D. Mich. 2020)
Court Description: NOTICE OF CORRECTION - INCORRECT IMAGE ATTACHED - OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS RENEWED 33 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANTS RENEWED 34 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING THE CASE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag) Modified on 4/20/2020 (LWag).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak v. Price Doc. 37 Case 2:16-cv-13528-RHC-SDD ECF No. 37 filed 04/20/20 PageID.1568 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________ WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL ROYAL OAK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-13528 ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. __________________________________/ JUDGMENT In accordance with the “Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Judgment, Denying Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment, and Remanding the Case to the Department of Health and Human Services” entered on April 20, 2020, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered for Plaintiff William Beaumont Hospital—Royal Oak, and against Defendant Thomas E. Price. Dated at Port Huron, Michigan, April 20, 2020. DAVID J. WEAVER CLERK OF THE COURT By: s/Lisa Wagner Lisa Wagner, Case Manager to Judge Robert H. Cleland S:\Cleland\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\16-13528.BEAUMONT.CrossMotionsforJudgment.JUDGMENT.docx Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
