LeBlanc v. Haas, No. 2:2015cv13624 - Document 3 (E.D. Mich. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Denying 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and Dismissing 1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (CPic)

Download PDF

LeBlanc v. Haas Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JEFFREY R. LEBLANC, #333019, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-13624 HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW RANDY HAAS, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT I. Introduction Michigan prisoner Jeffrey LeBlanc (“Plaintiff”) has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as an application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee for this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). His complaint concerns the validity of his current confinement. Plaintiff names Warden Randy Haas, in his personal capacity, as the sole defendant in this action and seeks monetary damages. Having reviewed the matter, the Court denies the application to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs and dismisses the complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Dockets.Justia.com LeBlanc v. Haas, No. 2:15-CV-13624 Page 2 of 4 II. Discussion Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”), a prisoner may be precluded from proceeding without prepayment of the filing fee in a civil action under certain circumstances. The statute provides, in relevant part: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section, if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). In short, the “three strikes” provision requires the Court to dismiss a civil case when a prisoner seeks to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee if, on three or more previous occasions, a federal court has dismissed the prisoner’s action because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Id.; see also Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) (holding that “the proper procedure is for the district court to dismiss the complaint without prejudice when it denies the prisoner leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the provisions of § 1915(g)”). Plaintiff is a prolific litigator in federal court. The Court’s records reveal that he has filed at least three prior civil actions which have been dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See LeBlanc v. Kalamazoo 2 LeBlanc v. Haas, No. 2:15-CV-13624 Page 3 of 4 Co. Sheriff, No. 1:14-CV-305 (W.D. Mich. July 29, 2014); LeBlanc v. State of Michigan, No. 1:14-CV-552 (W.D. Mich. June 19, 2014); LeBlanc v. Kalamazoo Co. Government, No. 1:14-CV-308 (W.D. Mich. May 21, 2014); LeBlanc v. State of Michigan, No. 1:14-CV-237 (W.D. Mich. March 26, 2014). Additionally, Plaintiff has previously been denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis for having three strikes on multiple occasions. See, e.g., LeBlanc v. Federal Government, No. 5:15-CV-10706 (E.D. Mich. March 19, 2015); LeBlanc v. Romanowski, No. 2:15-CV-10483 (E.D. Mich. March 2, 2015). Consequently, Plaintiff is a “three-striker” who cannot proceed without prepayment of the filing fee unless he can demonstrate that he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). To fall within the statutory exception to the three strikes rule, a prisoner must allege that the threat or prison condition is ‘real and proximate’ and the danger of serious physical injury must exist at the time the complaint is filed. See Rittner v. Kinder, 290 F. App’x 796, 797-98 (6th Cir. 2008) (citing Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003); Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 313 (3d Cir. 2001) (en banc)). An assertion of past danger is insufficient to invoke the exception. Id. Plaintiff does not allege any facts which indicate that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury so as to fall within the exception to the three strikes rule. Consequently, he is not allowed to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee for this action. 3 LeBlanc v. Haas, No. 2:15-CV-13624 Page 4 of 4 III. Conclusion Based upon the foregoing discussion, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has filed at least three previous lawsuits which have been dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that he has failed to establish that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury so as to fall within the exception to the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs and DISMISSES his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint with full payment of the filing fee ($350.00) and the administrative fee ($50.00). Lastly, the Court concludes that it has properly applied the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) such that an appeal from this order would be frivolous and cannot be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Arthur J. Tarnow Arthur J. Tarnow Senior United States District Judge Dated: October 22, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon parties/counsel of record on October 22, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Catherine A. Pickles Judicial Assistant 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.