Lorenz v. Social Security, Commissioner of, No. 2:2013cv11442 - Document 14 (E.D. Mich. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 13 Report and Recommendation Denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by William Lorenz, Granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM LORENZ, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-cv-11442 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. Charles E. Binder United States Magistrate Judge COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. __________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE S APRIL 18, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 13), (2) GRANTING THE COMMISSIONER S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12), (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 9); AND (4) AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder s April 18, 2014 Report and Recommendation Denying Plaintiff s Motions for Summary Judgment and Granting Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 13, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 9), GRANTS Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12), and AFFIRMS the findings of the 1 Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 13, 2014 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on May 13, 2014. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.