Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents et al, No. 2:2012cv14082 - Document 4 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (CCoh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION YOUNG YIL JO, 01183-112, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:12-cv-14082 v. HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Court has before it Plaintiff Young Yil Jo s pro se civil rights complaint brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff is a federal prisoner currently confined at the Correctional Institution in Big Spring, Texas. At the time he submitted his complaint, Plaintiff did not pay the required $350.00 filing fee, nor did he submit a proper application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(2); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997). Consequently, the Court issued a deficiency order requiring Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee within 30 days by October 30, 2012. The order provided that if Plaintiff did not submit either the full filing fee or the completed application within that time, his case would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Plaintiff has failed to correct the deficiency within the allotted time for doing so.1 1 The Court notes that Young Yil Jo is a frequent filer of lawsuits. See United States Party/Case Index, http://pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov; see also Hernandez v. Six Unknown Named Agents, et al., No. 1:10-CV-00372-LY (W.D. Tex. June 1, 2010); In re Jo, No. 1:10CV-390 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2010). WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that this complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. s/Stephen J. Murphy, III STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III United States District Judge Dated: November 7, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on November 7, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. Carol Cohron Case Manager 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.