-MJH Collins v. Selby, No. 2:2010cv12696 - Document 4 (E.D. Mich. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Denying 2 Application for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fee and Dismissing 1 Complaint, Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (DEld)

Download PDF

-MJH Collins v. Selby Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EARLAND J. COLLINS, #475522, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:10-CV-12696 HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH v. PATRICIA L. SELBY, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE AND DISMISSING THE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT I. Introduction Michigan prisoner Earland James Collins ("Plaintiff") has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an application to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs so that he may proceed without prepayment of the $350.00 filing fee for this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff names Patricia L. Selby, an attorney from Grosse Ile, Michigan, as the defendant in this action. In his complaint, Plaintiff contests Ms. Selby s actions as his court-appointed attorney in another federal case and asserts that she has violated his federal constitutional rights. He seeks monetary damages, as well as other relief. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act ( PLRA ), Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), a prisoner may be precluded from proceeding without prepayment of the filing fee in a civil action under certain circumstances. The statute states, in relevant part: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil 1 Dockets.Justia.com action or proceeding under this section, if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). In short, the three strikes provision requires the Court to dismiss a civil case where the prisoner seeks to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee if, on three or more previous occasions, a federal court has dismissed the prisoner s action because it was frivolous or malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Id.; see also Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) (holding that the proper procedure is for the district court to dismiss the complaint without prejudice when it denies the prisoner leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the provisions of § 1915(g) ). Plaintiff is a prolific litigator in federal court. The Court s records reveal that he has filed at least three prior civil actions which have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See, e.g.,: Case No. Defendant(s) Dismissal Date U.S. District Judge 08-CV-14881 Wayne Co. Pros. 12/22/2008 Paul D. Borman 09-CV-11785 Warren Police Dept. 06/04/2009 Nancy G. Edmunds 09-CV-12315 Frank Murphy Hall Nancy G. Edmunds 09-CV-14355 St. John Medical Ctr. 11/16/2009 06/22/2009 George Caram Steeh Consequently, Plaintiff is a three-striker who cannot proceed without prepayment of the filing fee unless he demonstrates that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). To fall within this statutory exception to the three strikes rule, a prisoner must allege that the threat or prison condition is real and proximate and that the 2 danger of serious physical injury exists at the time the complaint is filed. See Rittner v. Kinder, 290 F. App x 796, 797-98 (6th Cir. 2008) (citing Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003); Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 313 (3d Cir. 2001) (en banc)). A prisoner s assertion that he faced danger in the past is insufficient to invoke the exception. Id. Plaintiff neither alleges nor establishes that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury so as to fall within the exception to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The events giving rise to his complaint the actions of his court-appointed counsel do not concern such matters. Plaintiff has thus failed to establish that he should be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis despite the fact that he has had three or more prior lawsuits dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff s application for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Plaintiff is not authorized to proceed before this Court in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Additionally, the Court DISMISSES his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint with payment of the $350.00 filing fee. The Court notes that any such complaint will be reviewed to determine whether it should be served upon the defendant or summarily dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), which requires the Court to dismiss a complaint brought against governmental entities, officers, and employees if the complaint is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Lastly, the Court concludes that it has properly applied the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) such that an appeal from this order would be frivolous and, therefore, cannot be 3 taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2010 S/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on July 13, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Josephine Chaffee Deputy Clerk 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.