Imhoff Investment, L.L.C. v. Alfoccino of Auburn Hills, Inc. et al, No. 2:2010cv10221 - Document 112 (E.D. Mich. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendants' 111 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's 109 Motion for Class Certification re Text-Only Order Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AVIO, INC., a Michigan corporation, Individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-10221 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen vs. ALFOCCINO, INC., D. TALIERCIO INVESTMENTS, INC., and FARSHID ( TONY ) SHUSHTARI Defendants. ___________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFCIATION On September 24, 2013, Plaintiff moved for class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in this Telephone Consumer Protection Act matter. (Dkt. # 109). Under this Court s Amended Scheduling Order, discovery closes on October 25, 2013. (Dkt. # 98). Defendants now seek a slight reprieve from the normal 21-day response deadline under Local Rule 7.1(e)(1)(B) because their response is due before discovery cutoff. Accordingly, Defendants request that this Court extend the response deadline until a week after discovery cutoff. (Def s Mtn., Dkt. # 111, at 7). This will permit Defendants to 1 include information garnered during the deposition of Plaintiff s corporate and class representative, which is currently scheduled for October 3, 2013. (Id. at 6). This request is reasonable and the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants Motion. For all of the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff s Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file their response to Plaintiff s Motion for Class Certification no later than November 4, 2013. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that this does not affect any other dates in the Court s Amended Scheduling Order, including the dispositive motion cut-off date of November 25, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 8, 2013 s/Gerald E. Rosen GERALD E. ROSEN CHIEF, U.S. DISTRICT COURT I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, October 8, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager, 313-234-5135 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.