Allen v. Correctional Medical Services, No. 2:2009cv11281 - Document 51 (E.D. Mich. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER re 30 Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon. (Miles, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DERRICK ALLEN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-11281 v. DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID M. LAWSON CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. NO. 30) Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections ( MDOC ), filed this action under 42 U.S.C. §1983, alleging that defendant violated his constitutional rights. On November 2, 2009, Plaintiff filed this motion. This motion was referred to the undersigned for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A). For the following reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff provide this Court with a proposed amended complaint (with proposed changes clearly marked). Opinion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15(a)(2), a party may amend its pleading by leave of the court and the court should freely give leave when justice so requires. Appropriate factors to consider in determining whether to permit an amendment include: the delay in filing, the lack of notice to the opposing party, bad faith by the moving party, repeated failure to cure deficiencies -1- by previous amendments, undue prejudice to the opposing party, and futility of amendment. Perkins v. Am. Elec. Power Fuel Supply, Inc., 246 F.3d 593, 605 (6th Cir. 2001). However, because Plaintiff failed to submit a copy of his proposed amended complaint with his motion in accordance with E.D. MICH. L R 15.1, or fully explain in his motion how he wishes to amend his complaint, the undersigned cannot make a determination on Plaintiff s motion for leave to amend.1 Therefore, Plaintiff is ordered to submit his proposed amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order so that the Court may determine whether the proposed amendment(s) can be allowed. Plaintiff s proposed amended complaint shall be clearly marked to delineate where changes have been proposed to be made from the original complaint. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a pleading titled proposed amended complaint within twenty-one days of the date of this order, with all proposed changes clearly delineated, or this motion will be deemed dismissed. s/Mark A. Randon MARK A. RANDON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: December 1, 2009 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, December 1, 2009, by electronic and/or first class U.S. mail. s/Melody R. Miles Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon 1 Reference to a (proposed) amended complaint is made in Plaintiff s motion for leave to amend but does not appear as a docket entry. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
