Walter Toebe Construction Company et al v. Kard Welding, Incorporated, No. 2:2005cv73605 - Document 58 (E.D. Mich. 2009)
Court Description: DECISION on Damages. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/7/2009: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (JOwe).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
REVISED SUMMARY OF llLAINTIFFS' DAMAGES 1 2 3 4 Damae:e Catee:ol'Y Extra Fabrication Costs Damae:e Amount $127,852.52 Amounts Kard Charged To Load Raw Materials For Shipment to PDM Shipping Costs Plaintiffs' Increased Tax Burden $5,000.00 $46,561.61 $6815.12 (paid $67,160.61 vs. should have paid Kard $60,345.49) 6 7 8 Costs Incurred To Order Additional Plans For PDM Additional Emplovee Expenses Increased Travel Expenses Increased Supervision Costs $278.19 plus $43.06 shipping $29,900.00 $1,236.75 $10,000.00 9 Increased Equipment Costs $109,213.17 10 Lost Incentives $50,000.00 Total Exhibits 190,201,210,211,212,213, 214,215,216,217,218,219, 220,228,229,242,243,244, 245,246,250,296 227,229 235,236,240,243,245,246 190,201,205,210,211,212, 213,215,216,217,218,219, 220,229,239,240,242,243, 244,245,246,250,296 248,249 $386,900.42 5 Pre-judgment Interest As OfJune 18, 2009 $75,721.60 plus $46.83 per day after 6/18/09 251,290,292 251 268, 290, 288, 320, 322, 323, 324,325,326,327,328,329, 330,331,332,333,334,335, 336,337,338,339,340 238,297,308,320,322,323, 324,325,326,327,328,329, 330,331,332,333,334,335, 336,337,338,339,340 1,268,320,322,323,324, 325,326,327,328,329,330, 331,332,333,334,335,336, 337,338,339,340 $462,622.02 (as of 6/18/09) ~ PLAIN'TtFPS ~ EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A I .~ 1 PX341
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
