Lowe v. Walbro LLC, No. 1:2018cv12835 - Document 48 (E.D. Mich. 2022)
Court Description: Opinion and Order Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause and Staying Case Sua Sponte. (Show Cause Response due by 8/22/2022. Case Stayed Until 9/7/2022. ) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lowe v. Walbro LLC Doc. 48 Case 1:18-cv-12835-TLL-PTM ECF No. 48, PageID.1086 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION KENNETH LOWE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:18-cv-12835 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge WALBRO LLC, Defendant. ________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE AND STAYING CASE SUA SPONTE This is an employment-discrimination action arising under diversity jurisdiction. On May 13, 2022, this Court issued an amended scheduling order that set dates for Rule 23(a)(3)(b) disclosures, motions in limine, pretrial disclosures, a final pretrial conference, and a firm jury trial. ECF No. 47. Under the Eastern District of Michigan’s Local Rules, an attorney must be “a member in good standing of the bar of this court to practice in this court.” E.D. Mich. LR 83.20(i)(1). On July 11, 2022, The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan suspended Plaintiff’s attorney, Thomas Warnicke, under Local Rule 83.22. In re Warnicke, No. 2:22-mc51135 (E.D. Mich. July 11, 2022), ECF No. 2. This Court has the inherent authority to stay proceedings. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254–55 (1936) (holding that “the power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes in its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel[,] and for litigants.”). Exercising such authority is within the court’s discretion. Ohio Env’t Council v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 565 F.2d 393, 396 (6th Cir. 1977). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:18-cv-12835-TLL-PTM ECF No. 48, PageID.1087 Filed 08/08/22 Page 2 of 2 As a result of Attorney Warnicke’s suspension, Plaintiff’s attorney may not practice in this Court. To avoid prejudice to the Plaintiff, who now finds himself without counsel, this Court will sua sponte stay this case for 30 days—until September 7, 2022. In addition, Plaintiff will be directed to show cause in writing within two weeks of this order (1) why this Court should not remove Attorney Thomas Warnicke from this case and (2) why this case should proceed with Attorney Warnicke or new counsel. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to show cause in writing on or before August 22, 2022, why this Court should not remove Attorney Thomas Warnicke from this case. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to show cause in writing on or before August 22, 2022, why this case should proceed with Attorney Warnicke or new counsel. Further, it is ORDERED that this case is stayed until September 7, 2022, or until further order of this Court. Dated: August 8, 2022 s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge 2 -
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
