Cork v. United States Postal Service et al, No. 8:2022cv03306 - Document 12 (D. Md. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 4/25/2023. (c/m) (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cork v. United States Postal Service et al Doc. 12 Case 8:22-cv-03306-PJM Document 12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 4 m THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND LAUREN CORK Plaintiff, V. Civil No. 22-3306 PJM UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, etai, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Lauren Cork, a current employee of the United States Postal Service ("USPS"), has sued Defendants USPS and two of its Postmasters, Louis DeJoy and Lisa Hatton, for employment and disability discrimination, retaliation, and a myriad list of torts. Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 9. For the following reasons, no hearing being necessary, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss(ECF No. 9). k * * To summarize herpro se C omplaint, C ork alleges that her management at US PS has subjected her to verbal harassment, retaliatory threats to her job, and improper disclosures of her mental and physical status since 2016. C ork claims that she has consistently reported this behavior to her superiors (ranging from the Postmaster to the President of the United S tates) and filed "several" E E O complaints over the years, apparently with no relief.' ' A full list of C ork's claims can be found throughout her C omplaint, E C F No. 1. The C ourt notes that many of them, such as "victimizing of the victim" and "the allowance of bullying and intimidation," do not appear to be legally cognizable. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 8:22-cv-03306-PJM Document 12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 4 Case 8:22-cv-03306-PJM Document 12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 3 of 4 Case 8:22-cv-03306-PJM Document 12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 4 of 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
