United States of America v. Cymerman et al, No. 8:2019cv02824 - Document 13 (D. Md. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 12 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default for want of answer or other defense against all Defendants; granting 7 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint; directing the Clerk to enter default ag ainst the defendants; directing the Government to file a Motion for Default Judgment or explain why such a motion is inappropriate at this time within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 5/6/2020. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America v. Cymerman et al Doc. 13 Case 8:19-cv-02824-GJH Document 13 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * * Plaintiff, v. * MICHAEL CYMERMAN, et al., * Defendants. * * * Case No.: GJH-19-2824 * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”) brought this civil action to compel Defendants Michael Cymerman, Meredith Cymerman, ITPath Inc., and Yankee Cloud, LLC, to timely withhold, collect, and pay over to the Internal Revenue Service the corporations’ accruing federal employment tax liabilities and enjoin Defendants from further violating and interfering with the enforcement of the internal revenue laws. ECF No. 7-2. Pending before the Court is the Government’s Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, ECF No. 7, and the Government’s Motion for Entry of Default Against All Defendants, ECF No. 12. No hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2018). For the following reasons, the Government’s Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is granted and the Government’s Motion for Entry of Default Against All Defendants is granted. I. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT The Government filed the original Complaint in this case on September 26, 2019. ECF No. 1. On November 14, 2019, the Government filed a Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, requesting leave to add additional counts against Defendants and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 8:19-cv-02824-GJH Document 13 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 4 explaining that it inadvertently failed to include in the Complaint claims for unpaid federal income tax assessed against Defendants Michael Cymerman and Meredith Cymerman and Trust Fund Recovery Penalties assessed against Defendant Michael Cymerman. ECF No. 7. The Government states that it contacted opposing counsel in this matter, and received consent to the relief sought in the Motion.1 Id. at 1.2 At this stage of the litigation, the parties may amend their pleadings “only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Courts are to “freely give leave when justice so requires,” id., “unless the amendment would be prejudicial to the opposing party, there has been bad faith on the part of the moving party, or the amendment would have been futile,” Steinburg v. Chesterfield Cnty. Planning Comm’n, 527 F.3d 37, 390 (4th Cir. 2008). Here, Defendants consent to the amendment requested by the Government. Moreover, no undue delay or prejudice will result from allowing the amendment because no responsive pleading has been filed, discovery has not yet commenced, and no scheduling order has been entered. There is also no evidence of bad faith on behalf of the Government and the requested amendment is not futile. The Government’s Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is therefore granted. II. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS The Government also requests the entry of default against all Defendants. The docket reflects that a copy of the Summons and the Complaint was properly served on Defendants 1 Defendants have not filed a responsive pleading in this case, and no attorney has entered an appearance on their behalf. The Court assumes opposing counsel is Tim Sessing, who the Certificate of Service states is authorized to accept service on behalf of Defendants. See ECF No. 7 at 3. 2 Pin cites to documents filed on the Court’s electronic filing system (CM/ECF) refer to the page numbers generated by that system. 2 Case 8:19-cv-02824-GJH Document 13 Filed 05/06/20 Page 3 of 4 Michael Cymerman and Meredith Cymerman on October 2, 2019. ECF Nos. 8, 9. Defendants ITPath, Inc. and Yankee Cloud, LLC were also properly served on October 2, 2019 when copies of the Summons and Complaint were left with Meredith Cymerman, who is the resident agent for Yankee Cloud, LLC, ECF No. 11, and is also authorized to accept service on behalf of Michael Cymerman, the resident agent for ITPath, Inc., ECF No. 10. The twenty-one-day time period for Defendants to plead or otherwise defend in this action expired on October 23, 2019, and as of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants have failed to plead or otherwise defend as directed in the Summons and as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Government’s Motion for Entry of Default Against All Defendants is granted, and default shall be entered against all Defendants. III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland that: 1. The Government’s Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED; 2. The Government’s Motion for Entry of Default Against All Defendants, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED; 3. The Clerk SHALL enter default against Defendants Michael Cymerman, Meredith Cymerman, ITPath, Inc., and Yankee Cloud, LLC; and 3 Case 8:19-cv-02824-GJH Document 13 Filed 05/06/20 Page 4 of 4 4. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Government shall file a Motion for Default Judgment or explain why such a motion is inappropriate at this time. Date: May 6, 2020 _/s/_________________________ GEORGE J. HAZEL United States District Judge 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
