Yi v. White Oak Department of Motor Vehicle of Maryland, No. 8:2016cv01786 - Document 3 (D. Md. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 8/31/2016. (kns, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 8/31/16)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Yi v. White Oak Department of Motor Vehicle of Maryland Doc. 3 FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF t1ARYLMW IN THE UNITED STATES I)JSTIUCT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division CHONG SU YI, lOlh AUG3 I A": 2 I CLERK'S OFFICE * * Plaintiff, v, * WHITE OAK DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE OF MARYLAND, Defendant AT GREENBELT ....___ r:rD1ji By { * * * * * * Case No.: G./H-16-178() * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION Sell~represented Plaintiff Chong Su Yi liled the above-captioned Complaint 2016, together with a Motion to Proceed /n Forma Pauperis. against Defendant. Departmcnt of Motor Vchicles. Proceed /n Forma Pauperis In the Complaint. Oak Department shall be granted. '14. He of Motor Vehicles to allege that he paid 15 dollars to renew his dri\'er"s adds that previously. in 2007 and 2009. he \\ent to the White facility to obtain a license and both times was "retllscd" despite his "clean driving record in the state of Maryland:' facility's denial of his driver's license constitutes seeks an order to "eease and desist enlorcement Pursuant it detennines Id PlaintilT then alleges that the "involuntary servitudc:' of point system:' Id As rclicf Plainti IT ~i 8. to 28 U .S.C. ~ 1915( e )(2). a court may dismiss a case liled injiJl'/l1a pauperis if that the action is frivolous or I~lils to state a claim on \\hich relief may be granted. An action is frivolous baseless White Oak ECF Nos. I and 2. Because Yi appears indigent. the Motion to PlaintitTappears license in 2015. ECF NO.1 on .Junc I. if it raises an indisputably factual contentions. merit less legal theory or is l<llll1ded upon clearly such as I~mtastie or delusional scenarios. Neil:ke \'. lVil/iams.490 Dockets.Justia.com U.S. 319. 327-28 (1989). "Although pleadings tiled by a selt~represented plaintiff are to be liberally construed. the plaintitTs complaint must contain factual allegations suflicient .to raise a right to relief above the speculative level' and that 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.''' Harris 1'. Janssen Hea/lheare I'rodllels. No. CY ELH-15-2730. 2015 WL 5897710. al *2 (D. Md. Oct. 6. 2015) (citing Bell AI/til/lie 1'. T1I'l1l1/h/y. 550 U.S. 544. 555 (2007)). PlaintilThas not provided any information that might lead to a reasonable conclusion that some plausible cause of action has accrued on his behal!: or that any such cause of action would tall within this Court.s jurisdiction. Although PlaintilTappears to seck federal question ~d jurisdiction. there are no facts alleged in the Complaint supporting an)" such causes of action. :::,:;':: Date ~:'i",ifr, Comp',im willbedi"wi=d Ibllm" George J. Hazel United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
