USA v. 908 Monica Circle, Kingsville, Maryland 21087, No. 1:2008cv03374 - Document 10 (D. Md. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge William D Quarles, Jr on 9/25/09. (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, NORTHERN DIVISION * UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * Plaintiff, * v. CIVIL NO.: WDQ-08-3374 * REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 908 MONICA CIRCLE, KINGSVILLE, MD, with all buildings, appurtenances, and * improvements thereon, * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION The Government seeks forfeiture of 908 Monica Circle, Kingsville, MD 21087 ( the Property ) as property used or intended to be used in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a)(sexual exploitation of children and 2252A (certain activities related to child pornography). Thomas A. Coyne II has submitted a claim to the Property on behalf of a minor child, M. A. C. Government s motion to strike Coyne s claim. Pending is the For the following reasons, the motion will be granted. I. Background On December 15, 2008, the Government filed a complaint for forfeiture of the Property under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2254 and 981(a)(1)(C). Paper No.1. The owner of the Property, George K. 1 Hayward, was served with the complaint by mail at the Property on January 2, 2009, and at the Harford County Detention Center on May 13, 2009. Gov. s Mot. for Default J. at 1-2. On March 27, 2009, the Government published notice of the pendency of the forfeiture on an official government internet site (forfeiture.gov) in accordance with Rule G(4)(a)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions. Id. at 2. ran for 30 consecutive days. As required by Rule G, the notice Id. On April 27, 2009, Thomas Coyne II filed a timely claim against the Property on behalf of a minor child, M.A.C. No. 3. Paper Coyne identified the child as the victim of the offenses underlying the forfeiture action. Cl. & Answer ¶ 2. Coyne s claim was the only claim submitted. On April 30, 2009, the Government moved to strike Coyne s claim for lack of standing. II. Paper No. 4. Analysis The Government contends that Coyne lacks standing to contest the forfeiture because he has not alleged a sufficient interest in the Property. Gov. s Mot. to Strike at 1. Its motion to strike is under Rule G(8)(c)(B) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions and 2 Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 Civil forfeiture claimants have the burden of establishing standing by showing a legally cognizable interest in the property that will be injured if the property is forfeited to the government. United States v. 7,000.00 in U.S. Currency, 583 F. Supp. 2d 725, 729 (M.D.N.C. 2008) (quoting United States v. $38,000.00 in U.S. Currency, 816 F.2d 1538, 1543 (11th Cir. 1987)). The interest asserted must be an ownership or possessory interest. United States v. One-Sixth Share of James J. Bulger in All Present and Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233, 326 F.3d 36, 41 (1st Cir. 2003); United States v. Premises Known as 7725 Unity Ave. N., 294 F.3d 954, 956 (8th Cir. 2002); United States v. One 18th Cent. Colombian Monstrance, 797 F.2d 1370, 1375 (5th Cir. 1986). Coyne, on M.A.C. s behalf, does not allege an ownership or possessory interest in the Property. Rather, Coyne s asserted interest is based on M.A.C. s status as a victim of crimes that took place on the Property. Resp. to Gov. s Mot. to Strike at 1. In support of this assertion, Coyne cites regulations governing the remission or mitigation of civil and criminal forfeitures. See 28 C.F.R. §§ 9.1 - 9.9 (2009). 1 Although Coyne is correct Under Rule G(8)(c), in a judicial forfeiture action, the Government may move to strike a claim or answer . . . because a claimant lacks standing. This may be done in a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). 3 that victims of offenses underlying forfeitures may file petitions for remission or mitigation of the property, see 28 C.F.R. § 9.8 (2009), these petitions must be filed with the Department of Justice after judicial forfeiture. (2009). 28 C.F.R. § 9.4 The regulations do not grant judicial standing to victims. As Coyne has alleged no other basis for his claim, he lacks standing. III. Conclusion For the reasons discussed above, the Government s motion to strike will be granted. September 25, 2009 Date /s/ William D. Quarles, Jr. United States District Judge 4
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
