VIOLETTE v. PHAROS HOUSE et al, No. 2:2021cv00148 - Document 10 (D. Me. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting 8 Report and Recommended Decision By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
VIOLETTE v. PHAROS HOUSE et al Doc. 10 Case 2:21-cv-00148-DBH Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE, PLAINTIFF V. PHAROS HOUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:21-CV-148-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On August 23, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, his Recommended Decision After Review of Plaintiff’s Complaint. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on September 7, 2021. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
