ROSNER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2021cv00095 - Document 33 (D. Me. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 30 Report and Recommended Decision re 15 SS Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (clp)

Download PDF
ROSNER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Case 2:21-cv-00095-JDL Document 33 Filed 02/24/22 Page 1 of 2 Doc. 33 PageID #: 2063 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE KATHY R., ) ) ) ) ) 2:21-cv-00095-JDL ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Kathy R., the Plaintiff, filed a complaint (ECF No. 1) and Itemized Statement of Errors (ECF No. 15) requesting that the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) November 29, 2019 Decision (ECF No. 11-2 at 11-35) that she was not disabled for the purposes of supplemental security income under the Social Security Act be vacated and remanded. United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision with the Court on January 5, 2022 (ECF No. 30), pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2022) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Kathy R. filed an objection on January 19, 2022 (ECF No. 31) and the Commissioner filed a response to the objection (ECF No. 32). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge. I concur with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00095-JDL Document 33 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2064 for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceedings are necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 30) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2022. /s/ JON D. LEVY CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.