JAY v. MCC WINDHAM et al, No. 2:2020cv00219 - Document 11 (D. Me. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting 10 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
JAY v. MCC WINDHAM et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RUSSELL C. JAY, Plaintiff, v. MCC WINDHAM, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. 2:20-cv-00219-NT ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On January 12, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the Plaintiff, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 10), in which the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of the Amended Complaint if the Plaintiff had not filed an amended pleading within fourteen days. The time within which to file objections and to file an amended pleading has expired, and neither any objections nor an amended pleading has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the Plaintiff that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States District Judge Dated this 2nd day of February, 2021. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
