ALBERT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2020cv00210 - Document 24 (D. Me. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 23 Report and Recommendations By JUDGE JON D. LEVY (aks)

Download PDF
ALBERT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Case 2:20-cv-00210-JDL Document 24 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 2 Doc. 24 PageID #: 1277 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RONALD A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:20-cv-00210-JDL ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ronald A. seeks judicial review of the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s final decision determining that he is not disabled and denying his application for disability insurance benefits (ECF No. 1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(3) (West 2021) and D. Me. Local R. 16.3(a)(2), United States Magistrate Judge John H. Rich III held a hearing on the Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors (ECF No. 15) on March 10, 2021. The Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision with the Court on June 20, 2021 (ECF No. 23), recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. Having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-00210-JDL Document 24 Filed 07/27/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1278 (ECF No. 23) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED, and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Dated this 27th day of July, 2021. /s/ JON D. LEVY CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.