BARRY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2020cv00154 - Document 22 (D. Me. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 21 Report and Recommendations By JUDGE JON D. LEVY (aks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BARRY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE REBECCA B., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:20-cv-00154-JDL ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Rebecca B. seeks judicial review of the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s final decision determining that she is not disabled and denying her application for disability insurance benefits (ECF No. 1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(3) (West 2021) and D. Me. Local R. 16.3(a)(2), United States Magistrate Judge John H. Rich III held a hearing on the Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors (ECF No. 13) on March 8, 2021. The Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision with the Court on April 21, 2021 (ECF No. 21), recommending that the Court vacate the Commissioner’s decision. The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. Having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 21) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED. The Commissioner’s Dockets.Justia.com decision is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) for further administrative action consistent with this Order. SO ORDERED. Dated this 18th day of May, 2021. /s/ JON D. LEVY CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
