TRUMAN v. KELLEY, et al, No. 2:2020cv00108 - Document 10 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 8 Report and Recommended Decision By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
TRUMAN v. KELLEY, et al Doc. 10 Case 2:20-cv-00108-JAW Document 10 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE PETER P. TRUMAN, Plaintiff v. DANA KELLEY, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:20-cv-00108-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Recommended Dismissal of the Case, filed June 30, 2020 (ECF No. 8), the Recommended Decision is accepted 1. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1 Given the Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court held back on issuing the order to make certain that Mr. Truman was not going to file an objection. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-00108-JAW Document 10 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 29 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 31st day of July, 2020 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
