LOVE v. ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARY, No. 2:2019cv00445 - Document 4 (D. Me. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 . By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

Download PDF
LOVE v. ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARY Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHRISTOPHER LOVE, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL FLEET AUXILLARY, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:19-cv-00445-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 3) filed December 23, 2019, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis; however, Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B) as barred by the principles of res judicata. _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 21st day of January, 2020. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.