BOWDEN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2019cv00058 - Document 19 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 18 Report and Recommended Decision re: 11 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet, 12 SS Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BOWDEN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MELISSA D.B., Plaintiff v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:19-cv-00058-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision filed January 29, 2020 (ECF No. 18), the Court accepts the Recommended Decision. The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; the Court has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18) of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED and the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s administrative decision. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 14th day of February, 2020 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
