AURITT v. AURITT et al, No. 2:2018cv00471 - Document 125 (D. Me. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting 124 Report and Recommendations re: 106 Motion for Summary Judgment, 117 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
AURITT v. AURITT et al Doc. 125 Case 2:18-cv-00471-DBH Document 125 Filed 05/08/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1367 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GARY AURITT, PLAINTIFF V. SHANNON AURITT, DEFENDANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-471-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On April 23, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Amended Recommended Decision on Motions for Summary Judgment. The time within which to file objections expired on May 7, 2020, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to the remaining counterclaim against him is GRANTED. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to all four claims against her as well as her counterclaim against the plaintiff is DENIED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF MAY, 2020 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
