LILLY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2018cv00260 - Document 31 (D. Me. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: accepting 28 Report and Recommendations re 19 SS Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (tcs)

Download PDF
LILLY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHRISTY A. L., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:18-cv-00260-JDL ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ) COMMISSIONER, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge John H. Rich, III filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 28) on Christy A. L.’s social security disability and supplemental security income appeal with the Court on June 19, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Christy A. L. filed an Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 29) and the Commissioner filed a Response to the Objection (ECF No. 30). After reviewing and considering the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision. I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. Dockets.Justia.com It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 28) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Dated this 30th day of July, 2019. /s/ Jon D. Levy CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.