HOWARD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2018cv00012 - Document 14 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 13 Report and Recommended Decision re: 8 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
HOWARD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BETH H., Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:18-cv-00012-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision filed October 17, 2018, (ECF No. 13), the Recommended Decision is accepted. The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; the Court has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13) is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 8th day of January, 2019 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
