BURTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2017cv00502 - Document 20 (D. Me. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE accepting 17 Report and Recommended Decision re: 13 Social Security Statement of Errors/Fact Sheet By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (CCS)

Download PDF
BURTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHRISTOPHER B., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ) Deputy Commissioner for Operations, ) Performing the Duties and Functions ) Not Reserved to the Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) 2:17-cv-00502-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on November 4, 2018 his Recommended Decision. Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 17) (Recommended Decision). Christopher Burton filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on November 17, 2018. Pl.’s Obj. to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18) (Pl.’s Obj.). The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration filed a response to Mr. Burton’s objections on November 27, 2018. Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Obj. to the Report and Recommended Decision (ECF No. 19). The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; the Court has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; Dockets.Justia.com and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 17) is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision be and hereby is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 3rd day of January, 2019 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.