CHASE v. SAUFLEY et al, No. 2:2017cv00427 - Document 64 (D. Me. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 50 58 By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CHASE v. SAUFLEY et al Doc. 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine DANIEL L. CHASE, Plaintiff, v. LEIGH I. SAUFLEY, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:17-cv-00427-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 30, 2018 and February 9, 2018, his Recommended Decisions (ECF Nos. 50 and 58) respectively. Defendant filed an Objection to the Recommended Decisions (ECF Nos. 60 and 61) on February 21, 2018 and February 22, 2018, respectively. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decisions, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decisions; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decisions, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decisions of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Injunctive Relief (ECF Nos. 15, 17, 19, and 25) are hereby DENIED. Dockets.Justia.com 3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21) is hereby GRANTED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 14th day of March, 2018.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
