CARDENAS v. TACO BELL KFC et al, No. 2:2017cv00203 - Document 12 (D. Me. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 6 Report and Recommendations and 11 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CARDENAS v. TACO BELL KFC et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ELENA CARDENAS, Plaintiff, v. TACO BELL KFC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:17-cv-00203-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision (ECF No. 6) filed July 19, 2017, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 11) filed August 25, 2017, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff’s ability to assert an actionable claim. _/s/ George Z. Singal __ United States District Judge Dated this 14th day of September, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
