WOOD v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al, No. 2:2016cv00600 - Document 13 (D. Me. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 10 Report and Recommended Decision By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (lrc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
WOOD v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JAMES LEE WOOD, Plaintiff, v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:16-cv-00600-JDL ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 10) with the court on February 10, 2017, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The Report and Recommendation was returned to the Clerk as undeliverable on February 27, 2017 (ECF No. 12), and, on the same day, the Clerk received the Plaintiff’s notice of change of address. ECF No. 11. The Report and Recommendation was sent to the Plaintiff’s new address and the time within which to file objections was reset. The new time within which to file objections expired March 20, 2017, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED. The Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. Dockets.Justia.com Dated this 29th day of March 2017. /s/ Jon D. Levy U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
