DIXON v. DALTON GROEGER, No. 2:2016cv00178 - Document 51 (D. Me. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 46 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (ccs)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DIXON v. DALTON GROEGER Doc. 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RICHARD ALLEN DIXON, JR., Plaintiff, v. DALTON GROEGER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:16-cv-178-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On August 2, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. Recommended Decision (ECF No. 46). The Defendants filed their objection to the Recommended Decision on August 16, 2017 (ECF No. 47). I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision and the Defendant’s objection to the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I GRANT the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the Plaintiff’s retaliation claim and DENY the Defendant’s Dockets.Justia.com motion for summary judgment on the Plaintiff’s claim under the Fourteenth Amendment. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen__________________ United States Chief District Judge Dated this 1st day of December, 2017 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
