MURRAY v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al, No. 2:2015cv00484 - Document 188 (D. Me. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGES MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT re 185 Plaintiff's Objection By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (jib)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MURRAY v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al Doc. 188 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID E. MURRAY, PLAINTIFF V. WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:15-CV-484-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT On December 4, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge entered his Memorandum Decision and Order denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint. The plaintiff filed an appeal of the Magistrate Judge’s ruling on December 18, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Order, and I concur with the Magistrate Judge’s Order because it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and I determine that no further proceeding is necessary. The plaintiff’s objection is OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s Order is AFFIRMED because the Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).1 SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 I would reach the same conclusion following a de novo review under Rule 72(b). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
