ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al, No. 2:2015cv00263 - Document 47 (D. Me. 2016)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 41 Report and Recommendations; granting 34 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous; denying as mooting 42 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)

Download PDF
ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al Doc. 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL A. ESPOSITO, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT LANDRY, et al., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:15-cv-00263-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 41) filed December 22, 2015, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED and Defendants Peter Briggs, Robert Clinton, Jen Patton, Crystal Perfect, Wendy Riebe, and Eric Shoaps are dismissed from this action. It is also ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 42) is DENIED AS MOOT. _/s/ George Z. Singal District Judge _ Dated this 19th day of February, 2016. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.