COOMBS v. LANDRY et al, No. 2:2015cv00117 - Document 11 (D. Me. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, and denying Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Amend Complaint. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
COOMBS v. LANDRY et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine PATRICK S. COOMBS, Plaintiff v. SCOTT LANDRY, et al.,, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:15-cv-00117-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on April 13, 2015, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff filed his Objections to the Recommended Decision (ECF Nos. 9 and 10) on May 4, 2015. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED pursuant to §1915(e)(2) and 29 U.S.C. §1915A(a). 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 8) is DENIED as it fails to cure the defect in the initial Complaint. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 5th day of May, 2015.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
