MARCOUX et al v. SUSAN J SZWED PA, No. 2:2015cv00093 - Document 14 (D. Me. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; and adopting 11 Report and Recommended Decision. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (rmb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MARCOUX et al v. SUSAN J SZWED PA Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ALFRED MARCOUX and CHARLENE JONES, Plaintiffs, v. SUSAN SZWED, P.A., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) Docket no. 2:15-cv-093-NT ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On November 27, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Objection to Class Certification. The Defendant filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on December 11, 2015. The Plaintiffs responded on December 24, 2015. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. It is hereby Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Objection to Class Certification (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States Chief District Judge Dated this 6th day of January, 2016. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
