LANE v. LANDRY, No. 2:2015cv00036 - Document 10 (D. Me. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 7 adopting Report and Recommended Decision re Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing filed by JOHN AMOS LANE, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mjlt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
LANE v. LANDRY Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JOHN AMOS LANE, Petitioner, v. SCOTT LANDRY, Superintendent of the Maine Correctional Center, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:15-cv-036-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 28, 2015 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 8). The Respondent filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 9) on June 5, 2014. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. The Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal based on equitable tolling. The Respondent shall inform the Court Dockets.Justia.com by July 31, 2015 whether it will seek summary dismissal on the merits. The Petitioner’s Motion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen United States Chief District Judge Dated this 13th day of July, 2015. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
