BALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, No. 2:2014cv00061 - Document 22 (D. Me. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The commissioners Motion to Strike 15 is MOOT with respect to page 21 of Balls statement of errors, and is otherwise GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 21 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (nwd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
BALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JEANNE KATHRYN BALL, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-61-JDL ) ) ) ) ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 21) with the court on January 31, 2015. The time within which to file objections expired on February 17, 2015, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified plaintiff Jeanne Kathryn Ball (“Ball”) that failure to object would waive her right to de novo review and appeal of the Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The commissioner’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 15) is MOOT with respect to page 21 of Ball’s statement of errors, and is otherwise GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The decision of the commissioner is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Jon D. Levy___________ United States District Judge Dated this 2nd day of March, 2015. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
