KIMBERLY v. KARDASHIAN et al, No. 2:2012cv00196 - Document 9 (D. Me. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 7 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JONATHAN KIMBERLY AKA JONATHAN KOURTNEY, PLAINTIFF v. KIM KARDASHIAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 2:12-CV-196-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On June 28, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, her Recommended Decision on the plaintiff s pending motions. The time within which to file objections expired on July 16, 2012, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and this action is summarily DISMISSED. I place Jonathan Kimberly a/k/a Jonathan Kourtney on NOTICE that filing restrictions may be in the offing. Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island, 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993). This represents the cautionary order of which Cok speaks. Id. Groundless and inappropriate filings will not be tolerated. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2012 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
