DANIEL v. AVESTA HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al, No. 2:2012cv00110 - Document 74 (D. Me. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 63 Report and Recommendations and granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine DAVID DANIEL, Plaintiff v. AVESTA HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORP., ET AL, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:12-cv-110-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on July 9, 2013, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 63). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 72) on August 9, 2013. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 73) on August 23, 2013. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 27th day of August, 2013.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
